During a recent
research project to trace the British Roots of an Australian family, I found a
very interesting account of the voyage that took their ancestors to Western Australia in 1853, not as a convict but as a Pensioner Guard.
were retired soldiers who went to Australia as guards on the convict ships, often accompanied by their wives and
children, to start a new life. These
early settlers and their families totaled nearly 2,500 between 1850 and
1868. To encourage them to stay in the
colony, they were offered an allotment of ten acres of land which they could
select and lease for seven years and then own freehold. As an extra incentive,
a gratuity of £10 was given to each of them and they were promised the use of
convict labour to help clear the land.
The Surgeon Superintendents on the convict ships kept detailed journals of each voyage and passed on a report to the Governor of the Colony on arrival. Here are some fascinating extracts from the journal of John Bower MD, Surgeon Superintendent on board the Pyrenees that set sail bound for Fremantle in Western Australia with 296 prisoners and 94 passengers comprising 30 pensioner guards, their wives and children in 1853.
JOURNAL of Her Majesty's Hired Convict Ship "Pyrenees" Between 22nd December 1852 and 16th May 1853.
The prisoners embarked on board the Pyrenees were received from the following prisons:
22 Dec 1852 Warrior Hulk 55 Woolwich Defence Hulk 35
19 Jan 1853 Portsmouth Prison 50 Stirling Castle Hulk 2
24 Jan 1853 Portland Prison 88
28 Jan 1853 Dartmoor Prison 66
The total number of
prisoners embarked 296
“The average age of
the Prisoners was 25.55 years. Between 15 and 20 years there were 64; between 20
and 25 there were 114; 50 between 25 and 30; and the remaining 68 were upwards
of 30 years of age. There was a marked
difference in the appearance of the men received from the Hulks and those from Portland and Dartmoor
prisons; the former had a pale and waxy look which contrasted strongly with the
rusty and florid complexions of the men who had been exposed fully to the
bracing air of those elevated localities.
In the families of the
Guard there were several of their children who appeared ill qualified to
withstand the privations of so long a voyage. The heavy expenses entailed on a Pensioner by
providing his outfit and very great difficulty most of them would find in
repaying the advance made for that purpose renders the rejection of any of the
children a measure of great hardship to the parents. They were therefore all received on board. Five of them died on the voyage from various
complaints incident to their age. Here
may I be allowed to remark that I consider the addition of a few leeches to the
supply of medical stores would prove of much service in the treatment of these
children, the want of them was much felt on board the Pyrenees. The Guard being, with one or two exceptions,
men of whose constitutions had been long tried by Foreign Service suffered very
little from sickness. One aged man who
had never before left Ireland died of the prevailing fever. Although several of their wives were young
girls they all enjoyed good health.
The Crew were all
young men. The space appropriated to
them was much too small and only ventilated by a small narrow scuttle. It was impossible to remove the bottom boards
of the lower bunks as instead of being fitted like those of the prisoners, they
were fixtures. As sailors in the
Merchant Service are mainly averse to cleaning out their new place even when it
can be done without much trouble it was found very difficult to secure their
requisite cleanliness in this case where it was about impossible to reach dirt
which rolled by the motion of the ship under the sleeping places.”…….
“During the detention in the Channel and for several
weeks after leaving England many of those on board suffered from sea-sickness
and disordered bowels. The time occupied
in passing from England where the Thermometer stood at 50 degrees to the
variable winds near the Equator where it never fails below 80 degrees was only
17 days. A succession of light and
baffling winds prolonged the passage between the NE and the SE trade winds for
upwards of ten days. As usual a great
quantity of rain fell which rendered it necessary to keep the Prisoners below
much more than usual: they suffered so much from the heat and closeness that
many of them assured me it formed the worst part of their punishment.”........
the health of most of the persons embarked was improved by the voyage. The greater part of the prisoners were
disembarked by the 6th of May; the others waited on board for a passage in a
vessel shortly expected, until the 16th of May and the 2nd of June on which
date all that remained were sent on shore. The greater part of the Guard with their
families left on the 9th of May, a few being retained until all the Prisoners
John Bower MD
England is known as a nation of shopkeepers, but did you know that the oldest shop in England is Chiddingstone Post Office in Kent, serving customers since John Moody, a Tailor took on the lease in 1593: although the building is about 140 years older dating back to the reign of Henry VII.
A significant number of Family Trees contain “Cuckoos”; people that just don’t belong to that family but that are recorded as being a member by virtue of them either having the same or similar name or they are attached as a spouse; sibling; parent or child; without verification. There is nothing more annoying or disheartening than to find that a branch or even a core part of your Family Tree is not even your family! You have wasted time; effort; money and often emotions, connecting to these people and their lives, only to discover they just don’t belong.
So how do “Cuckoos” get into Family Trees?
Genealogy isn’t always flawless; incomplete or missing records; transcription errors; a quest to incorporate a family myth or legend; using others’ published trees as evidence; making assumptions; using unsourced material, can all contribute to the “Cuckoos” entering the tree and nestling there. Some may have been nestled there for many years! Another cause can be the over enthusiastic who, caught up in the excitement of discovering ancestors, rush to publish unsubstantiated trees. In time these are picked up by genealogy databases and the error is perpetuated.
Let me share some examples:
Whilst researching at the archive recently and having time to kill waiting for microfiche, I had a quick look at a published tree for the family I was researching; what an eye-opener – “cuckoos” in nearly every generation and no sources cited. No wonder this family had hit a research brick wall and had asked for my help.
Someone whose Grandfather had come from
Another well publicised example is the long held belief by actor John Hurt that his family descended from the Marquis of Sligo; a family legend passed down through generations. However, the truth unveiled by more thorough research was both fascinating but shattering to John Hurt who said at the end of his “Who Do You Think You Are?” episode “I’m not who I believed I was,” he added that his discoveries altered his sense of identity. “I’ll probably laugh about it before I know where I am,” he mournfully concluded, “but I don’t feel like laughing now.”
So how do you identify, oust and avoid “Cuckoos”?
Back to basics; work backwards from yourself and ensure that each fact for each person can be verified and that you have cited the source(s). This ensures that you have the evidence to make the link between generations. If you can not verify a person then “park them” outside your tree until you can.
Don’t presume; check and cross reference if possible; for example, ages on census records can be notoriously inaccurate so what other records are available to corroborate the facts.
Check the information makes sense; for example, supposed siblings born less than 9 months apart or children born to mothers well over 50, possible but not always probable.
Don’t skip generations because you have hit a brick wall, you need evidence to make the link back to the next generation so keep looking.
Remember that just because something is in print or published on the Web doesn’t mean that it is accurate. What are their sources? Check the facts and cross reference before you use this information in your tree.
Get another pair of eyes to look at your findings and to examine your evidence, this should throw up any inconsistencies as they should question dubious links.
If you are unsure whether someone belongs in your tree then don’t put them there until you can prove it, no matter how tempting it is to do otherwise. Keep the “Cuckoos” out!
Mention the British Bank Holiday and what do think of? Where to go? The wet and windy weather? That we have too few? In
In 1834 the Bank of England reduced the number of saints days and religious festivals it observed from 33 to just four; Good Friday; Mayday (1st May); All Saints day (1st November) and Christmas day, however, the general working population at that time were given only Good Friday and Christmas day as holiday.
Then in 1871 the Liberal MP and Banker John Lubbock, 1st Baron Avebury (1834 – 1913) introduced “The Bank Holidays Act 1871”. The Act designated four bank holidays in England, Wales and Ireland - Easter Monday, the first Monday in August, St Stephen’s day (Boxing day), and Whit Monday (Good Friday and Christmas day remained as traditional days of rest) and five in Scotland, New Year's Day, Good Friday, the first Monday in May, the first Monday in August, and Christmas Day.
The new Act was not only popular with the general public but also with Bankers and Business people as a provision within the Act gave them an additional day to pay their debts, Bills of Exchange falling due on a new Bank Holiday would be honoured on the next working day after the Bank Holiday.
Sir John Lubbuck was educated at
Lubbock also introduced the first “Ancient Monuments Protection Act 1882” protecting 50 monuments in Great Britain; so as you go out this rainy Bank Holiday, perhaps visiting an historical place of interest, spare a thought for the man initially responsible – Sir John Lubbock.
For me, genealogy and family history research is about more than a list of names and dates. Places; people; events; social context and history all add to the picture of how our ancestors lived their lives; and sometimes this background investigation can bring to light extraordinary incidents. Whilst researching background information on villages in the Cambridgeshire Fens, I came across the following tragic story:
The show began; and then at about , a fire broke out in the barn, and very quickly took hold. The nailed up entrance door prevented people from escaping easily and by the time the door was broken down 76 people - 25 adults and 51 children, had perished. A further two people died of their injuries some days later. A man was sent to trial on
This is taken from the Parish Register "The fire was occasioned by the negligence of a servant who set a candle and lanthorne in or near a heap of straw which lay in the barn. The servant's name was Richard Whittaker, from the parish of Hadstock in
Those who lost their lives in the tragedy were buried in a mass grave in the churchyard of St Mary’s and the grave is marked by a headstone known as the “Flaming Heart Gravestone”
In a hundred years time when our descendants look at the census record for 2001 or 2011, will they be as perplexed by their ancestors' occupations such as Webmaster; Reiki Healer or Blogger, as we often are by ours?
In 1801 the population of the new United Kingdom (formed through the 1800 Acts of Union) was about 10 million, with about 75% of the population living and working in the countryside. By the 1841 census, almost half of the population of about 16 million were living and working in towns and cities and by the 1911 census, only 20% of the UK population of about 40 million, lived and worked in the countryside.
The Industrial Revolution and the move away from countryside to urban living created many new occupations and with them new "job titles" just as the Technological Revolution has today. Here are some of the more curious occupations that I have come across through my research of census records and Birth, Marriage and Death Certificates, together with a brief explanation to help decipher what your ancestors actually did for a living. I admit to "cheating" for X and Z and have to give credit to Wikipedia for providing me with Xylographer and Zincographer to complete the alphabet.
Annuitant - This is someone who receives a regular income from investments
Beamer - Someone who drew the warp yarn through and onto the beam of a loom in weaving
Caffler - A rag and bone dealer
Devil - A printer's apprentice or errand boy
Fustian Cutter - Someone who cut the treads in the making of coarse woven cloth
Gloveress - A female glove maker/seller
Hackneyman -A horse drawn taxi driver
Ironsmith - A blacksmith
Journeyman - A freelance trades or craftsman
Kilner - In charge of the kiln at a pottery
Licensed Victualler - An innkeeper or publican
Mercer - A silk, cotton or woollen draper
Navvy -A labourer
Overlooker/Overseer -A foreman
Portmanteau Maker - Someone who made suitcases or trunks
Quister - Someone who bleached articles particularly cloth
Reeler -Someone who operated the machine that wound yarn onto bobbins
Slubber Doffer - Someone who removed empty bobbins from the looms
Throstler - Someone who operated a throstle machine used in spinning cotton or wool
Under House Parlour Maid -Deputy to the parlour maid
Vintner - A winemaker or wine seller
Worsted Twister -Worked a machine twisting yarns for the woollen mills
Xylographer - Someone who carved wooden blocks for printing
Yeoman -Usually a farmer who owned his land, entitled to vote and served on juries
Zincographer - Someone who etched zinc plates for printing